Raymond Jessop Trial Evidence

Advertisements

~ by FLDS TEXAS on February 1, 2011.

11 Responses to “Raymond Jessop Trial Evidence”

  1. That’s a beautiful baby.

  2. Hi, Alin.

  3. And it’s so sad that the poor child was born into conditions that substantially raise her chances to be physically/emotionally/sexually abused. After all, she is the result of sexual abuse.

  4. It really is sad. It’s even sadder that I still haven’t found out what happened to baby SpitU.

  5. Naming a child Spiritual Unity should be grounds to remove it from those abusive sobs. 😉

  6. I like ProudTexan’s nickname derivative the best. The little girl should be called “Child Bride SpitU”

  7. What did happen to ‘SpitU’?

  8. KitKat, we don’t know if she ever existed. Janet said something about her in an interview with CPS, but she was not among the children removed from the ranch. She would be about 9 months older that Zianna and her father would be Raymond’s brother Ernest.

  9. You know what? I didn’t think that comment was posted. Stupid phone!

    I had the feeling she didn’t actually exist and maybe it was just a rumour…

  10. We know they hide babies, no question of that. We know the YFZ have secret rooms built in. That one baby was faked so they couldn’t get cheek cells for DNA.

  11. She could have been removed from the ranch at the start of the raid. I just doubt that Janet would have made up a name like that during the CPS interviews.

    I also think I vaguely recall reading that name in Warren’s dictations. But, since there are thousands of pages of dictations, I wouldn’t know where to begin to look for her name.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: