UPDATED Wisan/Barlow Trespass Case Stayed

This is hard to read but worth the eye strain. It probably requires a little background also.

Bruce Wisan and Jethro Barlow have been charged by the Colorado City prosecutor with solicitation to trespass, a minor misdemeanor. This is based on the earlier trial of Isaac Wyler for trespass against alleged “victims” Rebecca Burnham and Aaron Nielson, neither of whom were actual victims — Nielson, by his own admission had no occupancy agreement to reside in the residence in question. Burnham did have an occupancy agreement but had abandoned the residence, as there was a gaping hole in the roof and the place was uninhabitable. Neither alleged “victim” was present when Isaac Wyler entered the premises or looked in the windows. The judge who convicted Isaac was noted FLDS water carrier, Justice of the Peace Mitchel Kalauli, who has been disqualified from Wisan’s and Barlow’s cases for bias.

In the Wisan/Barlow case, there were no complaining witnesses, no police investigation, no complaints made. This was a matter of the city prosecutor in Wyler’s case taking it upon himself to make examples of Wisan and Barlow based solely on testimony given by Wyler in his trial. Nevertheless the prosecutor is zealously pursuing the charges and lo and behold Michael Piccarreta has entered an appearance on behalf of the “victims” and is basically running the prosecution. Piccarreta, Piccarreta …. where have I heard that name before?

You may recall a couple of months ago, there was a huge document filing in Arizona with thousands of pages of dictations. Those dictations were part of the Wisan/Barlow Motion to Dismiss the case which alleged prosecutorial misconduct and bias, selective prosecution, discovery abuse and a request for the trial judge to make a preliminary determination of the relative property rights between the alleged “victims” and the defendants. The trial judge (Haney) refused to consider the attachments to the motion to dismiss and also declined to determine the property rights before proceeding with the criminal trial. The defense petitioned, by Special Action, the Superior Court based on the clear error of Haney and requested that the trial be stayed until the higher court could reconsider the defense motion to dismiss.

It looked as though the Superior Court was simply going to sit on the Special Action and allow the case to proceed to trial, making the issues moot. Not so. This Superior Court issued its order staying the criminal trial until it the Superior Court considers the defense Motion to Dismiss and allows for proper discovery as well as determination of the property rights. The language in the ruling is a decisive slap upside the head to Piccareta and Brendel (prosecutor), essentially calling out Brendel for conflict and misconduct and sticking it to Piccarreta by stating that his “victims” arent really victims. The judge also said that the volumes of documents filed by the defendants should not have been ignored by the lower court because they are relevant!

Maybe I’m just imagining it, but this ruling indicates that the real judge is leaning towards dismissing the charges or ordering the lower court to do so.

UPDATE 4-6-10:

Prosecutor Kenneth Brendel has withdrawn from representing Colorado City in this matter and a new firm has been substituted in. Reason were not given. I believe Colorado City has been posting for a job opening in this position for a while, but you have to wonder about the timing and whether it’s related to the defense allegations of prosecutorial misconduct.

~ by FLDS TEXAS on April 6, 2010.

4 Responses to “UPDATED Wisan/Barlow Trespass Case Stayed”

  1. I only read what was posted, not the document but whoa, it sounds like maybe someone’s awake after all. Ya think?

  2. oops, pic better watch out or he’s gonna strike out before he has his retirement plan fully funded.

  3. Wow, the wheels of justice turning in the right direction again?

    The FLDS get caught using public funds to pay off too many people?

    Bet there is a raid in Shortcreek soon…..

  4. Since they’d done it with the water co, why not fire co too. What else? What are they going to do about that hospital that won’t take non-FLDS but sure does take US & State taxpayers’ money?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: